I don't particularly care about this guy's alleged foibles (although it does sound kind of bad), but I do have issue with this site being portrayed as some auth

I don't particularly care about this guy's alleged foibles (although it does sound kind of bad), but I do have issue with this site being portrayed as some authoritative source of pure objectivity whose only goal is the unadulterated truth. It hasn't been an unbiased site since they went away from a focus on researching urban legends IMO. I encourage people to not take my word for it, but to search for terms like "snopes bias" and take into account a diverse set of perspectives.