4 ms·
>It's for long-term branches. Please elaborate how this helps you in long-term branches, instead of just assuming long-term branches aren't something most peop
by justinlaster 10y ago
>It's for long-term branches.
Please elaborate how this helps you in long-term branches, instead of just assuming long-term branches aren't something most people deal with on a daily basis.
>you might be happy to have a tool that helps untangle the web of merges somewhat.
This has no relation to long-term branches, this happens with any kind of normal history, and even shared history between repositories (which is a far messier thing to untangle). Yet this feature is unneeded, because the information can be correctly found within git in an accurate and not misleading fashion.