4 ms·
This seems like it all comes down to the remote-first vs. remote-friendly divide.[1] [1] My favorite post on the subject is Holman's: https://zachholman.com/po
by __derek__ 10y ago
This seems like it all comes down to the remote-first vs. remote-friendly divide.[1]
[1] My favorite post on the subject is Holman's: https://zachholman.com/posts/remote-first/ https://zachholman.com/posts/remote-first/
- gtaylor 10y agoNot ever saying a word in the office is just not realistic. You don't leave people out intentionally, but conversations happen organically sometimes. Maybe you're in the kitchen grabbing a poptart and start talking shop with someone who walks in. There are tradeoffs inherent in every working situation. This is one that really bothered me. It doesn't bother everyone, though.
- geoka9 10y ago> Maybe you're in the kitchen grabbing a poptart and start talking shop with someone who walks in. I find that most talks like that are just shooting the breeze. _Some_ of them are useful and in my experience it's usually then they happen rarely. So I think it is beneficial for the team to get together once in a while, but working like that should not be mandatory and you should just let people go back to their preferred routines ASAP. UPDATE: And yes, make sure the culture is "remote-friendly" ("remote-first") even if most of your workers spend most of their working time in the office, otherwise it's not going to work (and I'd argue that this is a good approach even if you don't have any remote workers, but that's for another post).