3 ms·
It's actually about 75x faster, not 1000x. I mean there's a difference between parallelizing basic code vs something like the LeNet-5. The sequential code was p
by benjaminPKP 10y ago
It's actually about 75x faster, not 1000x. I mean there's a difference between parallelizing basic code vs something like the LeNet-5. The sequential code was pretty standard. I mean I'm sure the CPU code could've been optimized more, I'm not trying to argue, I just thought it was interesting to see how fast you can make some CUDA code go
- p1esk 10y agoWait, did you make a typo, and it was 30 seconds for the CPU run time, not 30 minutes? If so, then yes, that's more realistic.
- benjaminPKP 10y agoOh wow. Now that's embarrassing. My bad for stirring things up with that