4 ms·
The url is correct, 'Docker-internals', but the title, and further equivocation of 'Linux Containers' and 'Docker', is a bit confusing. I'm a happy lxc/lxd user
by Demiurge 10y ago
The url is correct, 'Docker-internals', but the title, and further equivocation of 'Linux Containers' and 'Docker', is a bit confusing. I'm a happy lxc/lxd user, and had to stop reading because of the cognitive dissonance.
- agumonkey 10y agoI also thought it was about LXC. Sad.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- skeptic2718 10y agoWhy is it sad?
- dozzie 10y agoBecause LXC on a technical level is much simpler, doesn't make mess in network and filesystem setup, and is easy to understand. Docker does some heavy magic for things to work for programmers (the ones who can't be bothered to learn how ethernet bridging or IP routing work), so the whole thing feels brittle. In short, LXC is vastly underappreciated.
- so0k 10y agoGood point, updated the title. Thanks for the comments (and yes it's almost a year ago I wrote this post)
- Demiurge 10y agoThanks, feels like the nitpick, but I gave it another go, and I see some other changes now? Seems like a great amount of information.