3 ms·
> only to have the projects scrapped because they weren't what the business needed. That is most definitely not the programmers fault whatsoever. Scope, featur
by up_and_up 10y ago
> only to have the projects scrapped because they weren't what the business needed.
That is most definitely not the programmers fault whatsoever. Scope, feature set, product/market fit, and current status should be reviewed on a weekly basis by a product owner or project manager. If a general contractor builds you the house you demanded 6 months ago but your not happy with it now, who's fault is that?
> remote meetings are simply worse than in-person meetings
You give no explanation as your reasoning for this. Generally speaking, all meetings need to have an organized flow. I work on a team of 15 people where we can easily cover all our checkins remotely in under an hour. One meeting per week.
- ryandrake 10y ago> If a general contractor builds you the house you demanded 6 months ago but your not happy with it now, who's fault is that? Blame is not easily assigned in this scenario. If your requirements changed have you conveyed these changes to the builder? Did the builder periodically reach out to checkpoint with you and get feedback? Communication is a two way street. No professional developer anymore can turn off their E-mail and phone and "turtle up" in their office, coding away in a vacuum. Only the most trivial software can be developed that way.