this claim that because a robot can't do 100% of a job, they won't take over that job seems to pop up in every discussion about automation. If the only thing y

this claim that because a robot can't do 100% of a job, they won't take over that job seems to pop up in every discussion about automation. If the only thing you need a human for is to handle the delivery from the ground floor to the seventh floor, or to roll a pallet onto the back of the truck, you've eliminated 99% of the job. and if you've eliminated most of the work the job requires, that means you need a lot fewer people, and they need less skill and training and will be paid less. one junior staffer in every office being tasked to go down to the loading bay and check for packages after lunch each day is not a major infrastructure change.