4 ms·

No it wont, this is just a shitty ad for your shitty app, not even mentioning what causes the difference (between the competitors). Also these assumed gender r

by onodera 10y ago

No it wont, this is just a shitty ad for your shitty app, not even mentioning what causes the difference (between the competitors). Also these assumed gender roles trigger me: >Girls seem to be digging it too and not because they are looking for nice, free dinners

shigye 10y ago
I'm pretty sure I listed 3 reasons? The only important info I left out was the screen shots...I will post in a future blog. ...Actually, at the bottom I even said to challenge it yourself. You can check out other blog posts through my personal as well as the official blog for the app. There have been numerous tests ran in house to validate the match to actual date ratio falls roughly around 1% (which was interesting because in this little experiment it was way less). Dine does actually boast a 50% match to date ratio...I'm even urging you to try it before you bash it especially if you're someone who likes the concept of meeting someone for a first date over dinner or drinks (not for everyone). It's not a shitty app if it's getting people actual dates. Apps like Dine (I can name others too with a similar offline dating concept that I admire) are definitely solving the proximity and message wall issue (that mainly men face). You sound like someone I would love to have a real conversation with. If you would like, please email me your honest feedback after downloading Dine and I will do my best to make changes. I know we are not perfect so I'm always open to listening. Also, that "Girls seem to be digging it too and not because they are looking for nice, free dinners" was not assuming gender roles. This is common feelings or feedback we receive sometimes. If you go to our facebook page you can read some nasty comments. I always do my best to personally educate others that bills can be dutch, your treat, etc. My advice is actually always never assume. -Mike

by onodera 10y ago

shigye 10y ago

I'm pretty sure I listed 3 reasons? The only important info I left out was the screen shots...I will post in a future blog. ...Actually, at the bottom I even said to challenge it yourself. You can check out other blog posts through my personal as well as the official blog for the app. There have been numerous tests ran in house to validate the match to actual date ratio falls roughly around 1% (which was interesting because in this little experiment it was way less). Dine does actually boast a 50% match to date ratio...I'm even urging you to try it before you bash it especially if you're someone who likes the concept of meeting someone for a first date over dinner or drinks (not for everyone). It's not a shitty app if it's getting people actual dates. Apps like Dine (I can name others too with a similar offline dating concept that I admire) are definitely solving the proximity and message wall issue (that mainly men face). You sound like someone I would love to have a real conversation with. If you would like, please email me your honest feedback after downloading Dine and I will do my best to make changes. I know we are not perfect so I'm always open to listening. Also, that "Girls seem to be digging it too and not because they are looking for nice, free dinners" was not assuming gender roles. This is common feelings or feedback we receive sometimes. If you go to our facebook page you can read some nasty comments. I always do my best to personally educate others that bills can be dutch, your treat, etc. My advice is actually always never assume. -Mike