12 ms·
No I didn't, that was `astrodust`, not me. I was just providing an example of something that was wrong with them.
by phaemon 10y ago
No I didn't, that was `astrodust`, not me. I was just providing an example of something that was wrong with them.
- Chris2048 10y agoSorry, my mistake. On the other hand.. You answered for them? Only astrodust can know what problem astrodust has with Breitbart...
- astrodust 10y agoYou must be living under a rock. They're a tabloid on par with Weekly World News. http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/14/media/breitbart-incendiary-headlines/ http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/14/media/breitbart-incendiary-h...
- insickness 10y agoYou're linking to CNN, who told us that it was illegal for anyone but CNN journalists to read Wikileaks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X16_KzX1vE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X16_KzX1vE
- Chris2048 10y agoA page full of snippets with little context. Just to pick one: 'A July article suggested that research revealed "women might just suck at job interviews."' Is this claim false?
- phaemon 10y agoYou didn't ask what problem astrodust had with them. You asked what's wrong with them. I told you one thing. If you want a private conversation, then HN comments are the wrong venue.
- Chris2048 10y agoThe context suggested I was asking what problem astrodust had with them. I was asking astrodust specifically, and anyone else can see the answer; this would not be the case with a "private conversion".