4 ms·
I read that, but it doesn't read like he is aware of the option to revert a commit directly. More that he would remove them manually and commit that. Little di
by soft_dev_person 10y ago
I read that, but it doesn't read like he is aware of the option to revert a commit directly. More that he would remove them manually and commit that.
Little difference, but if "as clean as possible" was the goal, I think that would be the cleanest.
[edit] added the little words that my keyboard seems to filter out.
- OJFord 10y agoMaybe you're right; I agree that's probably what I would have done. Apart from anything else it allows a clean-slate "this is how it _should_ have been handled in the first place", rather than a separate git-fu move that was necessary or even relevant only because of the original indiscretion.