First off, they call it A/B testing, but unless they were sending the same patch with a different pseudonym, then they're incorrectly using the term. This isn'

First off, they call it A/B testing, but unless they were sending the same patch with a different pseudonym, then they're incorrectly using the term. This isn't true. As long as the patches were IID (e.g. she generated patches and randomly chose which name to submit them as), it's a legitimate A/B test. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_and_identically_distributed_random_variables https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_and_identically_di...