4 ms·
Here [1] is the actual statement on defense.gov. [1] http://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/1035122 http://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/
by andreasley 10y ago
Here [1] is the actual statement on defense.gov.
[1] http://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/1035122 http://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract-View/Article/...
- richardboegli 10y agoGood find. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13228363 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13228363
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- mdrzn 10y agoWe should change OP's link and leave the title.
- ageofwant 10y agoMr. Zargham certainly is a concise writer.
- up_so_floating 10y agoA bit too long-winded for me.
- provost 10y agoI'd encourage Mods to swap the link. Also, here is the Microsoft enterprise agreement for those interested: https://enterprise.microsoft.com/en-us/industries/government/dod-joint-enterprise-license-agreement-jela/ https://enterprise.microsoft.com/en-us/industries/government...
- sctb 10y agoThanks, we've updated the link from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-microsoft-pentagon-idUSKBN1492O4 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-microsoft-pentagon-idUSKBN....