The historical review of Fischer's life is interesting, but I always found these post-hoc analyses kind of dubious. It's almost like astrology; coming up with a

The historical review of Fischer's life is interesting, but I always found these post-hoc analyses kind of dubious. It's almost like astrology; coming up with a theory that explains human behavior, and then figuring out how to fit an individual case (like Fischer's) with the theory you came up with. In this case, it's instead the apparently scientific-sounding "MLCC methodology to psychobiographical research"