3 ms·
Many faculty "expressed concerns that our campus’s commitment to protecting the privacy of their communications is not demonstrated by Google and that the
by timdorr 16y ago
Many faculty "expressed concerns that our campus’s commitment to protecting the
privacy of their communications is not demonstrated by Google and that the
appropriate safeguards are neither in place at this time nor planned for in the
near future,” the letter said.
So, it's a decision made based on FUD. Sounds like that's going to work out awesomely for them.
Looks like they just want to move things back in-house for perceived control. That reminds me of a story about a major directory server at Georgia Tech going down regularly. The hard drive inside kept crashing on a regular basis. They restored backups, reinstalled software from scratch, and even replaced the hardware several times. It kept crashing until one day when a tech was out in the server room to restore it one more time. He found a technician working in the ceiling above on some sort of HVAC system. Below him was the server pulled out of the rack partially. The technician had been stepping on the combination of his ladder and the server itself to reach the unit he was working on.
So, yeah, on-campus servers are way more secure than scary Google servers in the mysterious "cloud"...
- viraptor 16y agoPoorly implemented local security does not prove anything about security of Google servers. You cannot draw such conclusions based on this event. For all you know, monkeys are flinging poo everywhere in the Google datacenter holding your Gmail account. In this case the university had at least the chance to fire the technician / hold him responsible. Good luck holding Google responsible for anything.
- proee 16y agohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7__SWWSaGM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7__SWWSaGM