> Then they decide they want to 'change the law retroactively 25 years back' [1] - this is gong-show Chavista banana republic type property theft. Apple should

> Then they decide they want to 'change the law retroactively 25 years back' [1] - this is gong-show Chavista banana republic type property theft. Apple should sue them aggressively. Taking into account that there was no change of laws and there was not loophole I don't know if you really know what the case is about > The only thing really sneaky that Apple did was pressure the Irish to give them a special deal, but it's still legal, and rational. No, those special and not public deals are ilegal > The EU is a terrible organization, they're incompetent, ideological, and they work against us as often as they work for us. Citation needed > You can't change laws and have them apply retroactively for 1/4 century, it's totalitarian. You keep repeating this, what laws were changed?