3 ms·
>Regarding #3, I'm personally 100% against any online advertising in any form. What is your preferred method of paying people on the internet for their content
by spott 10y ago
>Regarding #3, I'm personally 100% against any online advertising in any form.
What is your preferred method of paying people on the internet for their content? Do you think that micropayments would be a valid way to deal with this compensation gap?
- Sir_Cmpwn 10y agoDepends on the content. I like Patreon-style for YouTube, and that also occasionally fits with other things. I would also subscribe to a good source of news, though I haven't found one that qualifies as such yet.
- enraged_camel 10y agoNot the OP, but I prefer subscriptions. It's a direct exchange of money for value, and doesn't involve a creepy middleman whose incentive is to track you across the web.
- kuschku 10y agoI pay for the news that I read online by having subscribed to them also in paper form, or by paying taxes. Most other services I use are paid via subscription fees, or are run ad-free by people as hobby projects. Almost all the ad-supported services I use are monopolies anyway, have strict network lock-in effects, and shouldn't be in private hand anyway, instead they should be run by a cooperative, foundation, or government. (For example, web search, maps, phone books, etc). This leaves us with a few ad-supported pages which likely couldn’t directly survive in this new environment, but which rely on content creators for their business anyway – such as YouTube. For such cases, something like Flattr, but paid out by view, would be useful – something like the Datenträgerabgabe for the GEMA and VG Wort, but paid per month, not per empty CD bought.