3 ms·
> ... and that pushes FF and others to support border-radius without the vendor tag, might that be a good thing? Only if border-radius doesn't change it's sema
by geocar 17y ago
> ... and that pushes FF and others to support border-radius without the vendor tag, might that be a good thing?
Only if border-radius doesn't change it's semantics; say the standard switches from radii to area. Or perhaps they add some semantics for negative lengths.
If anything like that happens, then we now have two border-radiuses: Microsoft's and everyone-elses.
I think that with border-radii this isn't likely, but for whatever is still under debate, we could still be looking at this sort of thing.
- jasonlotito 17y agoI know. But then you have people saying that X-browser has HTML5 support, but HTML5 isn't even finalized. This means all those sites supporting HTML5 aren't supporting a finalized standard. So you can't use HTML5 now... technically. If you do, you aren't following the standards. Canvas shouldn't be used, nor should the video tags, for anyone who cares about standards. Technically. Getting a little to anal? =) Okay, before someone jumps on me and thinks I'm being serious, yes, I agree with you. It's 'dangerous,' but at some point, someone needs to say "Damnit! Let's make this work!" After all, you don't see anyone saying we should use vendor tags for HTML5 markup, even though HTML5 isn't complete, and can, and still does, change. The great thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. - Someone else, some other time.