3 ms·

The comments on the New York Times seem to be high quality.

by duaneb 10y ago

knieveltech 10y ago
A strong indicator of intense moderator activity.
djtriptych 10y ago
They employ people to moderate comments and select high-quality contributions. Not cheap.
danso 10y ago
They also expend significant resources in moderating it: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/20/insider/approve-or-reject-moderation-quiz.html http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/20/insider/approv... (a comically high amount of resources, IMHO; a good part of what their human editors do could be triaged through automated systems)
- sammermpc 10y ago
  FWIW, a move towards automated assistance is what motivated that article in the first place: "The New York Times is partnering with Google Jigsaw to create a new moderation system that will help us review incoming comments based on decisions our moderators have made in the past. Our moderators will continue to protect these discussions, but once this new system is launched, we will have robot helpers." I helped work on the interactive piece (though not the assisted comment moderation that they're rolling out).
- monksy 10y ago
  I took that quiz. They have some terrible opinions on what should and shouldn't be deleted. They supported side tracking of the conversation, injection of baiting morals (for a comment on gay marriage they said they'd allow someone to preach about their religious views on gay behavior and marriage). You can have r/the_donald supporters, "Not my President", and apathetic individuals in the same place... but only if you have strong rules to keep the peace.
  - MaxfordAndSons 10y ago
    > a comment on gay marriage they said they'd allow someone to preach about their religious views on gay behavior and marriage Unfortunately in that regard they're only following the same standards of acceptable arguments that hold in public spaces in the US.
stuart78 10y ago
I think that is in part because they are highly moderated, both by their internal team and user votes. Such moderation is costly, but I tend to think it is worth it for the good of the community. http://www.nytimes.com/content/help/site/usercontent/usercontent.html http://www.nytimes.com/content/help/site/usercontent/usercon...
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
vinhboy 10y ago
The NYT is the ONLY high quality comment "left" on the internet. It's sad that we are letting extremists mute comment sections.

The comments on the New York Times seem to be high quality.

by duaneb 10y ago

The comments on the New York Times seem to be high quality.

knieveltech 10y ago

A strong indicator of intense moderator activity.

djtriptych 10y ago

They employ people to moderate comments and select high-quality contributions. Not cheap.

danso 10y ago

They also expend significant resources in moderating it: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/20/insider/approve-or-reject-moderation-quiz.html http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/20/insider/approv... (a comically high amount of resources, IMHO; a good part of what their human editors do could be triaged through automated systems)

sammermpc 10y ago
FWIW, a move towards automated assistance is what motivated that article in the first place: "The New York Times is partnering with Google Jigsaw to create a new moderation system that will help us review incoming comments based on decisions our moderators have made in the past. Our moderators will continue to protect these discussions, but once this new system is launched, we will have robot helpers." I helped work on the interactive piece (though not the assisted comment moderation that they're rolling out).
monksy 10y ago
I took that quiz. They have some terrible opinions on what should and shouldn't be deleted. They supported side tracking of the conversation, injection of baiting morals (for a comment on gay marriage they said they'd allow someone to preach about their religious views on gay behavior and marriage). You can have r/the_donald supporters, "Not my President", and apathetic individuals in the same place... but only if you have strong rules to keep the peace.
- MaxfordAndSons 10y ago
  > a comment on gay marriage they said they'd allow someone to preach about their religious views on gay behavior and marriage Unfortunately in that regard they're only following the same standards of acceptable arguments that hold in public spaces in the US.

stuart78 10y ago

I think that is in part because they are highly moderated, both by their internal team and user votes. Such moderation is costly, but I tend to think it is worth it for the good of the community. http://www.nytimes.com/content/help/site/usercontent/usercontent.html http://www.nytimes.com/content/help/site/usercontent/usercon...

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

vinhboy 10y ago

The NYT is the ONLY high quality comment "left" on the internet. It's sad that we are letting extremists mute comment sections.