What's interesting to me is that a lot of times these things are somewhat open for interpretation depending on your definition of a monopoly, where the line is

What's interesting to me is that a lot of times these things are somewhat open for interpretation depending on your definition of a monopoly, where the line is drawn between good business decisions and anti-competitive behavior, etc. In this case though it seems pretty clear cut. Facebook said they couldn't link WhatsApp and FB user ids, but then two years later they did exactly that. Does Facebook really have any plausible response other than "oops"?