> When I say large, I mean about 6 gigs or so. Because your company's source tree is probably that large. GCC's SVN repo is north of 17 gigs (ref - http://gcc.

> When I say large, I mean about 6 gigs or so. Because your company's source tree is probably that large. GCC's SVN repo is north of 17 gigs (ref - http://gcc.gnu.org/rsync.html http://gcc.gnu.org/rsync.html) and yet neither svn nor git nor hg (when imported into them) seemed to have managed to blow up on it yet. Scalable means different things to different people, I expect. Size of the repo is one, but the number of highly distributed users is another and for many projects is much more relevant and one better served by git or hg or darcs. And a license fee of $740 per person per year is another form of non-scalability, again depending on the context.