5 ms·
Going by benchmark aggregates from PassMark. 2860QM: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-2860QM+%40+2.50GHz&id=886 http://www.cpubenchmark.ne
by ewzimm 10y ago
Going by benchmark aggregates from PassMark.
2860QM: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-2860QM+%40+2.50GHz&id=886 http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-2860QM...
6700HQ: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-6700HQ+%40+2.60GHz&id=2586 http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-6700HQ...
6920HQ: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-6920HQ+%40+2.90GHz&id=2699 http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-6920HQ...
- mrpippy 10y agoInteresting. For comparison, Geekbench 4 single/multi-core results (from https://browser.primatelabs.com/mac-benchmarks https://browser.primatelabs.com/mac-benchmarks): MacBook Pro (17-inch Late 2011, i7-2860QM): 3180 / 9593 MacBook Pro (15-inch Late 2016, i7-6700HQ): 3968 (+24%) / 12189 (+27%) MacBook Pro (15-inch Late 2016, i7-6820HQ): 4093 (+29%) / 12883 (+26%)
- ewzimm 10y agoNice comparison, thanks. I wanted to stress "about" since no benchmark is going to be identical to real world performance.