4 ms·
> Secondly, I found the touch screen very gimmicky. I tried using it for a week and found that my hand just hurt lifting it up repeatedly and also hated switchi
by untog 10y ago
> Secondly, I found the touch screen very gimmicky. I tried using it for a week and found that my hand just hurt lifting it up repeatedly and also hated switching context from the keyboard to the screen.
I agree, but on the other hand, I'm yet to find something that requires the use of the touchscreen. So I don't use it. Unless I'm carrying it around like a tablet, in which case it's a great feature to have.
- avn2109 10y agoYeah but you paid the money, reliability, and weight penalties for a touchscreen for no reason.
- untog 10y agoNot no reason - as I said, the tablet mode is useful. Just not in the scenario when you're normally be using a keyboard and trackpad.
- tech2 10y agoI bought the Dell XPS 13 with the hidpi display. I didn't buy it for the touchscreen and I couldn't buy it without if I wanted the resolution. I'd have happily paid less for the same resolution but longer battery life (low power for driving the touch sensor and more for driving the display to a greater brightness to support the same display brightness). I figure I should have put up with a lower resolution display tbh, which is sad.
- kupiakos 10y agoPersonally, I find FHD on a 13-inch screen perfectly fine. One might be able to distinguish between FHD and QHD on the screen, but definitely not at a regular viewing distance. This way, I don't have to deal with any of the issues that HiDPI typically brings as well. What I really wanted was a non-touch FHD Developer Edition with Rose Gold, but c'est la vie. It's been one of my favorite laptops.
- tech2 10y agoYeah, like I said, I should have just stuck with the FHD display :( Tradeoffs...