4 ms·
I know. The article covers both (or did I mix it in with another of coffeemug's articles?). But coming from C# 2.0, Lisp's functional-supported-but-optional wa
by pchristensen 17y ago
I know. The article covers both (or did I mix it in with another of coffeemug's articles?). But coming from C# 2.0, Lisp's functional-supported-but-optional was still a big jump.
- eru 17y agoYes. Lisp is an acceptable functional language, and its communities also value functional approaches. (Whereas Python gives you almost the same support from the language, but much less from the communities and libraries. (My main grief is that dicts only have side-effecting operations.))