3 ms·
Back at ya! Very good point regarding {agree|disagree but constructive|non-constructive}. Which really just leads us back to up/down + flag, doesn't it? Then bo
by grzm 10y ago
Back at ya! Very good point regarding {agree|disagree but constructive|non-constructive}. Which really just leads us back to up/down + flag, doesn't it? Then both up-voting and down-voting would count towards "un-dimming" while flagging would count towards dimming, I think. Thanks for working through this with me...er, bringing me around to your opinion :)
- lisper 10y agoIsn't it amazing what can happen when people discuss something rationally? :-)
- grzm 10y agoIndeed! Two additional/final thoughts: - It really should be a ternary selector, not up/down + flag. You should only be able to select one of the three. - Having both up and down contribute to undimming would actively discourage using disagree as "punishment". It would very likely change how "flag" is used, though the proper use of "flag" is unclear to me right now, as from what I can tell its effect is not visible until the comment is dead. It would clarify the effect between "down" and "flag".