2 ms·
So what you're saying is, had they appealed, they would have had a bunch of case law on their side, which may or may not have mattered to the appellate court.
by bb88 10y ago
So what you're saying is, had they appealed, they would have had a bunch of case law on their side, which may or may not have mattered to the appellate court.
Again, if they felt they would have won, they should have appealed.
- steveeq1 10y agoI'm saying that the liebeck case was an outlier. The vast majority of judges throw off hot coffee cases (as hot or hotter) as "frivolous".