3 ms·
Because making safe, efficient settings the hard-to-tamper-with default would be waaay too sensible?
by smegel 10y ago
Because making safe, efficient settings the hard-to-tamper-with default would be waaay too sensible?
- awj 10y agoMore sensible than trying to have a conversation by stating your points as condescending "questions". In case you actually care to discuss it, there's definitely a trade-off between variety of cipher support (which some people want) and efficiency of cipher support (which some people absolutely need). Prioritizing one over the other is not a clear or simple decision.