4 ms·
> ... just, you know ... you know ... Yes, I know. Do you? You made the suggestion that skip lists are inferior to ordered lists, not me. (good for "increasing
by andars 10y ago
> ... just, you know ... you know ...
Yes, I know. Do you? You made the suggestion that skip lists are inferior to ordered lists, not me. (good for "increasing access times on ordered lists") I'm still perplexed as to your rationale for that statement.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoNo, I didn't, AFAIK. I'm baffled as to where you drew that from...
- cronjobber 10y agoMaybe because you wrote "increasing access times", which could be read as "skip lists are slower." Not what you meant, probably.
- andars 10y agoThis was my understanding of that comment. How else could that be read? I am not able to think of another interpretation of that statement or a context when increased access times would be desired.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoThe intended interpretation is that skip lists make access to specific items in ordered lists faster. I am actually a native speaker, so I have no excuse here. I just suck at writing, I guess...