4 ms·
Indeed. Security isn't a binary. There's plenty of layers. And we went from "Print picture" to "Compute Sfm 3d object from thousands of photos, and have acces
by kefka 10y ago
Indeed. Security isn't a binary. There's plenty of layers. And we went from
"Print picture" to
"Compute Sfm 3d object from thousands of photos, and have access to a 3d printer that large that can print human-sized heads, and paint it appropriately in the correct color-space as to trigger the right facial recognition"
It's then trivial to add a feature of 'Blink' and 'Smile'. We have public, free haar and lbp cascades for those. It would be a few lines to add in a check that requests those 2 actions.
"Then you have to print an articulated skull and musculature that activate the appropriate smile/blink responses, with the correct coloring across the face."
And then hope that the video feed of the disjoined head trying to pass as human isn't just sent to the butler or a family member for "quality control"....
- roryisok 10y ago"Lady, you just hired the A-Team"
- mywittyname 10y agoAfter all that, your low-brow partner in crime picks up a rock, smashes a window, and bob's your uncle.
- lazaroclapp 10y agoA somewhat surprising feature of suburbia in the US (for those of us that come from less safe countries) is that someone like Mark could ever have unbarred windows at street level directly facing a public street. In many places, this kind of recognition system would be at the outer gate of the complex, surrounded by tick concrete walls ending in an electrified fence or similar[1]. At that point, the face recognition does become the weaker link. Also, even in US suburbia, smashing the window is likely going to trigger a burglar alarm and get the police called to the location, whereas bypassing the face recognition system will not. [1] For a non billionaire house: thinner concrete walls ending in broken glass or decorative-yet-functional metal barbs, outer wall shared by a 10-20 homes neighborhood.