3 ms·
>Security detail? Why would he need or want this? Given his worth it's not hard to justify. The world has plenty of criminals and mentally unstable people. In
by rl3 10y ago
>Security detail? Why would he need or want this?
Given his worth it's not hard to justify. The world has plenty of criminals and mentally unstable people.
Interestingly, the satellite office model that the article decries strikes me as a huge boon in physical security for both him and his employees.
That said, if I were a Snap employee I'd probably have a field day with the jokes anyways.
"The Emperor's coming here? We shall double our efforts!"
- bogomipz 10y ago>"Given his worth it's not hard to justify." His net worth exists only on paper until theres a liquidity event. I've spent time in both Unicorns and hedge funds and none of the founders have had body guards, at least not at the office.
- rl3 10y ago>His net worth exists only on paper until theres a liquidity event. Point is he's high profile and has a lot to lose. If I were on track for being a billionaire many times over, I'd probably be a little paranoid too. Besides, for all we know he could have received specific threats and his security arrangement is completely justified. Granted, secrecy and paranoia often do go hand-in-hand.