Here's the outline of the argument. 1. McDonald's knew or should have know that their temperature could cause third degree burns. 2. McDonald's received com

Here's the outline of the argument. 1. McDonald's knew or should have know that their temperature could cause third degree burns. 2. McDonald's received complaints and did nothing. They did not even put a warning label on the menu. 3. Because there was no warning label, plaintiff did not know she could receive serious injury which may have impacted her decision to not buy it. You can make the argument that just because there was a warning label doesn't mean she would have read it. But on the contrary, if the warning label is not there, she has no chance to read it.