2 ms·
That's a really good point, and it's actually close to the reasoning that `class` stuff was added to JS. Since everyone was making their own incompatible ones,
by Klathmon 10y ago
That's a really good point, and it's actually close to the reasoning that `class` stuff was added to JS.
Since everyone was making their own incompatible ones, they decided to standardize it even though it really shouldn't have existed in the language at all.
I don't know, personally I'm "neutrally against" them. I'm not going to be upset if they make it in, but i'm not going to personally use them and I don't really feel they are needed as the problems they solve can be better solved by other methods/architectures (some of which admittedly aren't in browsers yet).
That being said, i'm really hoping that the opponents of it come out in january and explain their reasoning.