4 ms·
Even if passed, this would be unenforceable. Pornography is notoriously difficult to define in a legal context; see Jacobellis v Ohio. Miller v California furth
by bovermyer 10y ago
Even if passed, this would be unenforceable. Pornography is notoriously difficult to define in a legal context; see Jacobellis v Ohio. Miller v California further explores the issue and attempts to lay some kind of groundwork for definition, but it's still very subjective.
- a3n 10y ago> Pornography is notoriously difficult to define That's the beauty of such a scheme, you can go after anyone just by making a "pornography" case, without being constrained by definitions. It widens prosecution and control tremendously.