3 ms·
> I still don't know why every computing device must have a color screen that plays videos. It's mainly because hardware design is more expensive than software
by Kadin 10y ago
> I still don't know why every computing device must have a color screen that plays videos.
It's mainly because hardware design is more expensive than software design. I've been working for a while on a side project that's going to be a standalone "appliance" of sorts, and it's much easier to basically punt on the hardware -- just toss a general-purpose SoC in there, with a big old touchscreen on top, and then do the entire UI in software -- than it is to iteratively design the UI in hardware, with traditional buttons, switches, LCD multiline displays, etc. Even though I think the overall UX is often much better with traditional hard controls (more tactile feedback, easier to use without looking or with vision impairments... long list).
3D printing is closing this gap a little, but it's still a heck of a lot easier to upload some new files to a touchscreen-based device and plop it in front of your testers than it is to produce a new version of a hard control panel.
- 0xdeadbeefbabe 10y ago> with a big old touchscreen on top So a monochrome screen and USB input are actually harder to find I take it? I also noticed snapdragon doesn't do wired ethernet.
- khedoros1 10y agoI know that it's easy to find 16x2 character LCD displays, 7 segment displays, and small monochrome displays (like old phone displays), but at least at the hobbyist level, it seems like you may as well go for the general-purpose color screen. Similar sized screens look like they're around the same price, regardless of if they're color or not.