This stands out: > IBM does not have a technical answer to OpenLava and to the benefit its users have. > They cannot articulate why their software is better t

This stands out: > IBM does not have a technical answer to OpenLava and to the benefit its users have. > They cannot articulate why their software is better than OpenLava for the money they > charge for it. IBM fears OpenLava because is does provide a better functionality than > their own software and that's why it can only reply with a lawsuit by hiring: > Kirkland & Ellis LLP. As an emotional, rather than logical appeal. It doesn't matter how great OpenLava is if they have violated IBM's copyrights.