> They are not randomized strings of insider shibboleths. the joke is that from many people's perspective real papers are indistinguishable from this. > Their

> They are not randomized strings of insider shibboleths. the joke is that from many people's perspective real papers are indistinguishable from this. > Their work is not easy to understand and, yes, they can be interpreted in many different ways. saying this about a paper would lead many in the harder science to question what the point of work that is able to be interpreted in multiple ways, does the paper even matter or is it just my interpretation that matters and if it's just my interpretation why should I even care about the paper to begin with, if something can mean anything doesn't it just mean nothing?