4 ms·

I am pretty sure if HTML5 implement the same scene as bunker.swf it would hog much much more CPU. http://www.ponticstar.com/projects/burning-words/ http://www.

by est 17y ago

I am pretty sure if HTML5 implement the same scene as bunker.swf it would hog much much more CPU. http://www.ponticstar.com/projects/burning-words/ http://www.ponticstar.com/projects/burning-words/ Try set the font to 100, and see if it's still as smooth as you thought.

not_an_alien 17y ago
Canvas is by all means a CPU hog and much slower than software-mode Flash. http://vimeo.com/10553088 http://vimeo.com/10553088 But hey, Flash is dying, etc
- Shorel 17y ago
  Flash Games, demos, and webcomics are nice. However: No matter the codec or operating system, we should not NEED Flash to view video on the Web.
  - est 17y ago
    i completely agree however, suppose you are about to design a video site for the common public back in 2005, what technology would you choose? quicktime? realplayer? windows media player? i dont think flash video is unneeded any soon, even if html5 has a 70% adoption rate, people would still need flash for h.264 fallback
Shorel 17y ago
150 in Opera runs smooth