3 ms·
Neat. This example is nowhere near as pretty as the Flash examples, but it's interesting that my CPU is barely doing anything even when walking around. In the F
by jm4 16y ago
Neat. This example is nowhere near as pretty as the Flash examples, but it's interesting that my CPU is barely doing anything even when walking around. In the Flash version my CPU is pegged just sitting there doing nothing.
- est 16y agoI am pretty sure if HTML5 implement the same scene as bunker.swf it would hog much much more CPU. http://www.ponticstar.com/projects/burning-words/ http://www.ponticstar.com/projects/burning-words/ Try set the font to 100, and see if it's still as smooth as you thought.
- not_an_alien 16y agoCanvas is by all means a CPU hog and much slower than software-mode Flash. http://vimeo.com/10553088 http://vimeo.com/10553088 But hey, Flash is dying, etc
- Shorel 16y agoFlash Games, demos, and webcomics are nice. However: No matter the codec or operating system, we should not NEED Flash to view video on the Web.
- est 16y agoi completely agree however, suppose you are about to design a video site for the common public back in 2005, what technology would you choose? quicktime? realplayer? windows media player? i dont think flash video is unneeded any soon, even if html5 has a 70% adoption rate, people would still need flash for h.264 fallback
- Shorel 16y ago150 in Opera runs smooth