2 ms·
Something I thought about while looking at this: How come the code is made "material", but the variables and "objects" of the code are still abstract/just named
by thomasahle 10y ago
Something I thought about while looking at this: How come the code is made "material", but the variables and "objects" of the code are still abstract/just named? Have anybody thought about how to make the data objects more real as well?
- eternalban 10y agoThe 'flow' is "materialized" [using your terminology] since everyday intuitions accessible to anyone can serve as guide for 'assembling' an algorithm. For objects, we are talking structure, mostly. If you require that higher level of (semantic) expressiveness it seems at odds with using something like this. We can manifest a object (or structure) as a (say) box, with slots. But if you are doing that, shouldn't you just upgrade to Python?