4 ms·
The title clearly implies an assumed cause and effect relation, while the article itself doesn't even propose any mechanism for causation, only that there is a
by sporkologist 10y ago
The title clearly implies an assumed cause and effect relation, while the article itself doesn't even propose any mechanism for causation, only that there is a correlation. I consider this a form of clickbait (and bait-and-switch), therefore my snarky reply above.
- tomhoward 10y agoDang didn't say you're not allowed to refute the substance of an article. He just asked that you don't be "shallow", or in your own words, "snarky" about it, as it always makes discussions worse and degrades HN overall.