Serious question: Why are these considered "DSLs"? To me, these are just libraries with functions. Are they considered DSLs just because Lisps are basically an

Serious question: Why are these considered "DSLs"? To me, these are just libraries with functions. Are they considered DSLs just because Lisps are basically an AST to begin with? Because when I think of a DSL, I think of something like SQL, or HTML, that is definitively different syntax, with it's own interpreter, for a specific purpose. Function calls in Clojure doesn't match with the definition of what's in my head here. This is sort of what I was getting at in my original comment.