5 ms·
Another problem they might face: As an adult, I've never used shampoo. I can see that shampoo/conditioner might provide interesting outcomes for people with lon
by galago 10y ago
Another problem they might face: As an adult, I've never used shampoo. I can see that shampoo/conditioner might provide interesting outcomes for people with long hair carefully maintained for aesthetic reasons. For me though, its like fabric softener, a product category from which I will never purchase.
- Perceptes 10y agoHow do you clean your hair?
- coderzach 10y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_poo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_poo
- bicubic 10y agoJust using running water and a comb is enough. If you have short hair and don't work in particulate rich environments, there's no reason to use shampoo.
- Turing_Machine 10y agoIf you have a buzz cut (or some other very short hairstyle, as it sounds like the OP does), you might as well just use the same soap you use for your face. It will work fine.
- Tharkun 10y agoYou use soap on your face? I use water. My face turns to parchment when using soap
- lisivka 10y agoI saw no hard soap for long time. All soap I use is creamy soft soap. I remember that I had same problem with regular soap when I was young. Modern soap causes a very little harm to face, if any.
- lisivka 10y agoA tiny bit of expensive shampoo after soap is works even better. Try to ionize plastic pen with your hair after a soap and after a shampoo. If you wear a hat, it matters.
- galago 10y agoI'm sorry for the lack of clarification. My morning shower starts with the bar soap on the top of my head and precedes downwards. One could think of this is how the US military now uses the same fuel for aircraft, tanks and trucks. I still wash my hair, but I'm on a mono-soap system. Is this sub-optimal for attracting sexual partners?--I can't say. It is very convenient, however.
- raverbashing 10y agoYes, you don't need shampoo if you're bald or cut your hair (very) short Otherwise, it only goes to add to the stereotype, I guess And yes, it absolutely does make a difference.
- coldtea 10y ago>And yes, it absolutely does make a difference. No, it absolutely doesn't, if you still wash your hair. Not to mention you can use ordinary soap or shower gel and it will do just fine. The proliferation of such BS (non existent back in the day -- the first synthetic shampoos were introduced in the 1930s, with daily shampooing becoming the norm in the US by the 1970s and 1980s) is mostly due to marketing and cargo cult.
- raverbashing 10y ago> No, it absolutely doesn't, if you still wash your hair. Oh of course. Because all shampoos have the same alkalinity and same composition, right? If we're talking about supermarket brands I agree they all do have similar compositions. Sounds like a lot of people here have never washed their hair with something besides common brands. > Not to mention you can use ordinary soap or shower gel and it will do just fine. Yes, some shower gels are made as shampoo (some even says in the bottle, but I agree most of them do work fine as shampoo... for a day or two) > The proliferation of such BS Do you know what's even better to clean yourself? Diluted caustic soda. It's an excellent grease remover.
- coldtea 10y ago>Sounds like a lot of people here have never washed their hair with something besides common brands. Few of us have experienced the magnificent sound of $1000 Monster hi-fi cables either...
- raverbashing 10y agoYes, people obviously pay $1000 for top shampoo brands