4 ms·
I agree the scholarly article's title is better. Your comment did mention another point which appeared to discredit the article/research: >probably failed A/B
by wallace_f 10y ago
I agree the scholarly article's title is better.
Your comment did mention another point which appeared to discredit the article/research:
>probably failed A/B testing
- greglindahl 10y agoThat is also a reference to the title of the "news" article on gizmodo.com. Sorry that this wasn't clear. In particular, I was imagining that gizmodo A/B tested "Most of Greenland Melted about a Million Years Ago" vs "Most of Greenland Melted in the Recent Past". The latter (to a non-geologist) is quite a bit more sensational.