3 ms·
I think it is clear the "more fake" source is the one that is "more questionable". The audience of a source doesn't lend or take credibility.
by hulahoof 10y ago
I think it is clear the "more fake" source is the one that is "more questionable".
The audience of a source doesn't lend or take credibility.
- Spivak 10y agoI think the parents argument is that that harm done by disseminating false information is both a function of the inaccuracy of the information and its reach. If a major news source intentionally slips subtle inaccuracies into their stories to push some agenda it could reasonably be argued that it causes more harm than a small no-name blog with no readership publishing blatant lies.