4 ms·
Pornorgaphy is not intellectual property. So it should not be copyrightable. It doesn't promote "sciences and useful arts"
by cft 10y ago
Pornorgaphy is not intellectual property. So it should not be copyrightable. It doesn't promote "sciences and useful arts"
- swiley 10y agoI'd like to see a good definition of "useful arts" then. Would a film based off of "She Kills Monstors" or another similar play fall under your definition of "useful arts"? What about video games?
- anigbrowl 10y agoYou know, every time you start an argument with some bald assertion like 'pornography is not intellectual property' you should be willing to answer the question 'why not?' before trying to develop the rest of your argument. I reject your premise, and since you're proposing it without any supporting arguments I'm not going to give any arguments either. It's on you as the person proposing to change things to explain why we should accept your claim, and when you give arguments to support it then I'll happily engage with those and tell you why I disagree.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]