5 ms·
Note that this launch wasn't from the equator, because this constellation needs to overfly hurricanes. It's fairly uncommon for LEO satellites to want to be at
by greglindahl 10y ago
Note that this launch wasn't from the equator, because this constellation needs to overfly hurricanes.
It's fairly uncommon for LEO satellites to want to be at the equator. GEO, extremely common.
- Retric 10y agoLaunching from the equator is useful for a wide range of orbits as a component of the final vector 1600km/h is really not that fast and your final orbit crosses the equator anyway. The only issue is if the ideal launch point is not over the ocean. Also, there is a wide band near the equator with close to optimal velocity.
- greglindahl 10y agoYeah, I suppose my comment was not the most clever. In this case they were only launching 1/2 the max payload so performance wasn't really an issue anyway.
- bsdetector 10y agoIt's about 5% of the final velocity, but that's way more than 5% fuel savings because you don't have to suspend million of pounds against gravity for a minute and also don't have to accelerate that fuel. For example Saturn V used 40% of its total fuel to get up to this speed. That's a huge savings. Unless I am reading the data incorrectly: http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/SaturnV.pdf http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/SaturnV.pdf
- Retric 10y agoVector addition means you save energy, but not one to one. EX: if you add 1 going north and 1 going east then your final vector is 1.414 going north east. So, it might only be worth 1% or 5% of the final velocity.