I'm not looking to convince anyone of having deep-seated problems. Here's a reframing of my argument. I think: - two sources of addiction that are the most di

I'm not looking to convince anyone of having deep-seated problems. Here's a reframing of my argument. I think: - two sources of addiction that are the most difficult to identify are undiagnosed/unknown physical causes and undiagnosed/unknown psychological causes. - belief impacts the brain's ability to recognize or ignore patterns - medical professionals usually better able to diagnose/discover physical causes than patients because they've received a lot of training & have access to good tools for examining the patients - medical professionals need to practice assuming (ie. TEMPORARILY choosing to believe) something's physically wrong with the patient (especially since addictions has physical effects on the brain!) in order to reduce the incidents where a patient's issues are easily dismissed as psychosomatic - mental health professionals lack good tools for diagnosing/discovering mental issues & can't directly inspect a patient's psyche - patients can help mental health professionals diagnose/discover mental issues, as well as confirm the absence of any, by assuming (again...temporarily & only during the time when with the professional) they do have deep seated issues & they simply aren't aware of them Once someone's willing to explore their own psyche with curiosity and if they're willing to share w/the professional whatever comes to mind, they can start making a list of things in their past that seem questionable, including the things they normally wouldn't consider. If there's anything I'd like to convince people of, it's the benefits of learning how to temporarily challenge one's own standard patterns of thought, ie. having an open mind.