5 ms·
All I see here are a lot of personal attacks. Feel free to explain what your definition of "religiosity" is and why it doesn't apply to what Bambax quoted.
by judahmeek 10y ago
All I see here are a lot of personal attacks. Feel free to explain what your definition of "religiosity" is and why it doesn't apply to what Bambax quoted.
- solipsism 10y agoI asked which part is religious. Bambax quoted some non-religious things. Why would it be on me to prove everything he/she says is not something it obviously isn't? Also, which attack is personal? I'm attacking an interpretation. Nothing personal about it.
- recursive 10y agoOk, so what is Googleyness?
- solipsism 10y agohttps://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+does+googlyness+mean https://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+does+googlyness+mean
- judahmeek 10y agoWhen you ridicule any aspect of a person (such as their interpretation of "religiosity"), it's a personal attack. Look up the definition of "personal". Oh, and yes: calling someone's interpretation of "religiosity" "ridiculous" is literally ridiculing said personal interpretation. Btw, I noticed that you still haven't provided your own definition of "religiosity". Are you worried that someone else might ridicule that as well?