4 ms·
None of that approaches religiosity. Your ridiculous interpretation is colored by your preexisting opinions about Google. Your logic also fails you. Developers
by solipsism 10y ago
None of that approaches religiosity. Your ridiculous interpretation is colored by your preexisting opinions about Google.
Your logic also fails you. Developers having the freedom to do what's right for the user doesn't imply they succeed.
- judahmeek 10y agoAll I see here are a lot of personal attacks. Feel free to explain what your definition of "religiosity" is and why it doesn't apply to what Bambax quoted.
- solipsism 10y agoI asked which part is religious. Bambax quoted some non-religious things. Why would it be on me to prove everything he/she says is not something it obviously isn't? Also, which attack is personal? I'm attacking an interpretation. Nothing personal about it.
- recursive 10y agoOk, so what is Googleyness?
- solipsism 10y agohttps://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+does+googlyness+mean https://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+does+googlyness+mean
- judahmeek 10y agoWhen you ridicule any aspect of a person (such as their interpretation of "religiosity"), it's a personal attack. Look up the definition of "personal". Oh, and yes: calling someone's interpretation of "religiosity" "ridiculous" is literally ridiculing said personal interpretation. Btw, I noticed that you still haven't provided your own definition of "religiosity". Are you worried that someone else might ridicule that as well?