4 ms·
I think it's just not intuitive for me. HOWEVER, that being said, I think based on my experience, all of the languages that had solid prototypal OOP, provided t
by andrewmcwatters 10y ago
I think it's just not intuitive for me. HOWEVER, that being said, I think based on my experience, all of the languages that had solid prototypal OOP, provided the foundation for class-based OOP, too. So you really get the best of everything.
I think you should go forward with your decision. I think the foundational designs probably matter more: providing flexibility to those who desire either is a tremendously powerful thing.
- jetti 10y ago>HOWEVER, that being said, I think based on my experience, all of the languages that had solid prototypal OOP, provided the foundation for class-based OOP, See, I wouldn't want to add class-based OOP as I feel that would "soil" the language as one could just completely ignore the prototype aspects and use it as a class-based language.