> The mistake was to see herself as the primary victim from day 1... Except if you read the entire article, she says that she didn't at first see this as haras

> The mistake was to see herself as the primary victim from day 1... Except if you read the entire article, she says that she didn't at first see this as harassment, only as an embarrassing situation. It was only after the harassment and intimidation escalated that she looked back to see where it really began. > ...rather than a beneficiary of unearned perks. The empathy she demands for herself... Your entire post comes across as something one of her harassers would write in retaliation, and this in particular sticks out. If a woman doesn't want white knights to come to her rescue, that's her prerogative, not for you or anyone else to dictate, and it's certainly not a character flaw or an excuse for continued harassment and intimidation.